Keep up to date with Salmons Solicitors using our news section for the latest information.
Can the duty of care of a local authority be delegated?
Imagine two scenarios; in the first, a 10 year old school child was attending swimming lessons as part of a school class but the lessons were provided by a third party known as Direct Swimming Services. The child was not properly supervised and got into difficulties in the water and suffered a severe brain injury.
In the second scenario, a child was placed with two sets of foster parents between 1985 and 1988 and she suffered abuse in both placements.
Are the local authority liable?
The swimming pool case is Woodland v Essex County Council (2015) a decision of the Supreme Court on appeal. The Claimant won against the local authority because of the existence of five factors making it reasonable to impose a duty which the local authority could not delegate to Direct Swimming Services.
1. The claimant was a vulnerable child requiring protection
2. The claimant was in the care or custody of the school
3. The Claimant had no say in how the education authority acted
4. Though the Education Authority delegated its supervisory role to Direct Swimming Services
5. Though Direct Swimming had been negligent, the Education Authority was liable.
One might have thought that those five factors applied with equal force to the local authority in the foster care case but that case is NA v Nottingham County Council (2015) and in that case the claimant failed. The Court of Appeal said that the provision of family life was not in the remit of a local authority, and fostering was a function it had to entrust to others. The local authority had discharged, not delegated, its duty and a distinction had to be drawn between a case of negligence and a case of direct abuse or assault and there was no legal precedent in English law for establishing a non-delegable duty of protection from assault. The relationship between a foster carer and a local authority was not akin to an employer and employee relationship which would make it reasonable to impose a duty. The claimant is appealing to the Supreme Court.
Latest News Articles
THE OFFICE WILL BE CLOSED FROM 12PM ON 1ST MAY 2018 FOR TRAINING ON THE NEW EU GENERAL DATA PROTECTION REGULATION 2016 WHICH COMES INTO FORCE LATER THIS MONTH Read More
Has the tide has finally turned in social services failure to remove cases? Read More
Stephen Brookes, Assessor of the Personal Injury Panel of the Law Society, looks at the recent decision in Crawley v Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council Read More
The Government is still deluding itself in thinking that denial of access to justice will cause insurance premiums to fall. Read the full report here - Read More
Latest Government attempts to deny access to the courts are responded to by the Solicitors' profession. Read More
Association of Personal Injury Lawyers calls for a complete ban on nuisance calls about accident claims
APIL have issued recently a press release to try and persuade the Government to put an outright ban on intimidating cold callers pestering members of the public to make accident claims for accidents which they have never had. Read More
The Government's plans to prevent irritating claims being brought against their friends in the insurance industry continue to attract criticism. Read More
Stephen Brookes reviews two cycling injury cases making the legal headlines recently Read More
Stephen Brookes looks at two personal injury cases on either side of the fence; in the former case the claimant won but in the latter case the claimant failed. Read More
If ever there was a minefield in the application of applicable rules it is in the area of discrimination law. Stephen Brookes reviews the recent case of Griffiths v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions ( 2015) Read More
Since April 2015 the Court has had power to strike out a claim for personal injury compensation if a claimant has been fundamentally dishonest - but what does this mean? Read More
Supreme Court decision changes the meaning of an unlawful penalty charge in contract law - Beavis v Parking Eye reviewed Read More
Working time might now include travel to and from the first and the last job for employees who are based at home. Read More
Following the decision of Salmons Solicitors to withdraw from all legal aid work upon the grounds of unsustainable remuneration levels, there is increasing pressure for criminal defence legal practices. Read More
Stephen Brookes reviews the latest attempts by the Coalition Government to make the legal claims process unworkable. Read More
Stephen Brookes reviews two recent personal injury claims where the claimants both failed. Read More
There can be few more fun pursuits than taking your off roader into difficult and challenging off road terrain, but before you do so, a cautionary word about a recent change of insurance law, writes Stephen Brookes. Read More
Stephen Brookes reviews the recent case of Bear Scotland Ltd v Fulton on the inclusion of overtime into holiday pay calculations. Read More
Stephen Brookes reviews the decision of the Supreme Court in Coventry and Lawrence (2014) Read More
High Court Judge rules Government's Motor Insurers Compensation Scheme for uninsured drivers unlawful. The case is reviewed by our personal injury specialist Stephen Brookes Read More
Stephen Brookes reviews two recent cases dealing with the question of when an employer can be liable for injuries inflicted by a member of the workforce on another person Read More
Farah Gilani reviews a January 2014 case involving a prosecution over an unguarded piece of machinery. Read More