Keep up to date with Salmons Solicitors using our news section for the latest information.
Fundamental Dishonesty in Injury Claims
It has been the practise in some cases for about 25 years that insurers secretly video-filmed claimants in continuing injury cases to verify that there was no exaggeration of injury and in my time as an injury claim solicitor here in Stoke on Trent, writes Stephen Brookes, I have had sent to me several mundane and tedious video-films of my clients out shopping or driving somewhere.
There have however been notable occasions ( not in my practice, I stress) where a claimant informs the court that they cannot run and are then video-filmed running 5 miles on a Sunday morning jog, or running to catch the bus. Is this fundamental dishonesty or mere exaggeration?
The distinction is important.
A claimant solicitor is required to put his client's case at its best but this does not permit exaggeration. In an attempt to limit the cost of insurance, under-writing no win no fee cases when such insurance cost was no longer recoverable from the losing side, the Government brought in one-way costs shifting. Lose an injury claim and, generally, with three exceptions, a claimant will not have to pay the opponent's legal fees.
But one exception is dishonesty and in April 2015 the court was given specific power to strike out an injury claim for fundamental dishonesty but no corresponding power was given to the court if a Defendant was dishonest.
If a claim is struck out for fundamental dishonesty the claimant becomes liable for the costs and has no insurance to fall back on.
But what if a trial occurs and the court prefers the evidence of the Defendant which is more polished and the contradictions ironed out? What if the poor injury claimant gets confused and baffled by a cunning and skilful defence barrister and contradicts himself such that the court prefers the evidence of the opponent? In such cases there is anecdotal evidence that the insurance lobby are arguing that such cases are fundamental dishonesty.
These are worrying times !!
Latest News Articles
Stephen Brookes, Assessor of the Personal Injury Panel of the Law Society, looks at the recent decision in Crawley v Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council Read More
The long running saga concerning the entitlement of an estranged adult child cut out of a deceased's parent's will is finally resolved, writes Donna Riley of Salmons Solicitors. Read More
The Government is still deluding itself in thinking that denial of access to justice will cause insurance premiums to fall. Read the full report here - Read More
Association of Personal Injury Lawyers calls for a complete ban on nuisance calls about accident claims
APIL have issued recently a press release to try and persuade the Government to put an outright ban on intimidating cold callers pestering members of the public to make accident claims for accidents which they have never had. Read More
The Government's plans to prevent irritating claims being brought against their friends in the insurance industry continue to attract criticism. Read More
Stephen Brookes reviews two cycling injury cases making the legal headlines recently Read More
Stephen Brookes looks at two personal injury cases on either side of the fence; in the former case the claimant won but in the latter case the claimant failed. Read More
If ever there was a minefield in the application of applicable rules it is in the area of discrimination law. Stephen Brookes reviews the recent case of Griffiths v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions ( 2015) Read More
A recent case on the duty of swimming pool lifeguards confirms 1999 guidance Read More
Since April 2015 the Court has had power to strike out a claim for personal injury compensation if a claimant has been fundamentally dishonest - but what does this mean? Read More
Supreme Court decision changes the meaning of an unlawful penalty charge in contract law - Beavis v Parking Eye reviewed Read More
Working time might now include travel to and from the first and the last job for employees who are based at home. Read More
Following the decision of Salmons Solicitors to withdraw from all legal aid work upon the grounds of unsustainable remuneration levels, there is increasing pressure for criminal defence legal practices. Read More
Stephen Brookes reviews the latest attempts by the Coalition Government to make the legal claims process unworkable. Read More
Stephen Brookes reviews two recent personal injury claims where the claimants both failed. Read More
There can be few more fun pursuits than taking your off roader into difficult and challenging off road terrain, but before you do so, a cautionary word about a recent change of insurance law, writes Stephen Brookes. Read More
Stephen Brookes reviews the recent case of Bear Scotland Ltd v Fulton on the inclusion of overtime into holiday pay calculations. Read More
Stephen Brookes reviews the decision of the Supreme Court in Coventry and Lawrence (2014) Read More
Stephen Brookes reviews two recent cases dealing with the question of when an employer can be liable for injuries inflicted by a member of the workforce on another person Read More
Farah Gilani reviews a January 2014 case involving a prosecution over an unguarded piece of machinery. Read More
Stephen Brookes reviews a recent case involving an injury compensation claim brought by one friend against another arising out of the use of loaned leisure equipment. Read More
Nick Mason looks at the risk from not using a traditional high street law firm offering a quality managed service Read More