Keep up to date with Salmons Solicitors using our news section for the latest information.
The tide is still running against claimants at the Court of Appeal!
In the case of Sloan v Governors of Rastrick High School, heard in 2014, a learning support worker whose job included pushing the wheelchairs of disabled pupils, brought a claim for a shoulder injury basing her case on Regulation 4 of the Manual Handling Regulations 1992 which states that an employer must try to avoid the need for employees to undertake a manual handling task involving a risk of injury; if it cannot be avoided, the employer is to risk assess the task and reduce the risk to the lowest level reasonably practicable and introduce training and guidance.The claimant's argument was that electric wheelchairs ought to have been provided but the court decided, and the Court of Appeal agreed, that this was not practicable for the employer because students used their on wheelchairs and which wheelchair was suitable was based on medical considerations.
I think this is the right decision in the circumstances.
In Landau v Big Bus Co Ltd and Another ( also 2014) at a set of traffic lights in central London were a VW in the inside lane, the claimant on a scooter in the middle lane and a bus in the outer lane. The road ahead of the traffic lights bore sharp left. When the lights changed all three moved forward simultaneously and the scooter rider was trapped between the car and the bus. He suffered a serious injury to his right leg which had to be amputated. The court decided that he was in the blind spot of the mirrors both of the car driver and the bus driver and was not positioned in the road where he said he was. The court could not conclude that either driver had been negligent and the scooter rider was foolhardy for pressing forward in circumstacnes where he was open to being squashed between two larger vehicles. Even if the court had found either driver negligent it would have decided the scooter rider was three-quarters to blame for doing that.
In my opinion, drivers should adjust their mirrors so as to eliminate a blind spot. The scooter rider presumably was not at the very mouth of the junction and if he had been he would have been spotted readily. This to me seems a harsh decision.
Latest News Articles
Stephen Brookes, Assessor of the Personal Injury Panel of the Law Society, looks at the recent decision in Crawley v Barnsley Metropolitan Borough Council Read More
The long running saga concerning the entitlement of an estranged adult child cut out of a deceased's parent's will is finally resolved, writes Donna Riley of Salmons Solicitors. Read More
The Government is still deluding itself in thinking that denial of access to justice will cause insurance premiums to fall. Read the full report here - Read More
Association of Personal Injury Lawyers calls for a complete ban on nuisance calls about accident claims
APIL have issued recently a press release to try and persuade the Government to put an outright ban on intimidating cold callers pestering members of the public to make accident claims for accidents which they have never had. Read More
The Government's plans to prevent irritating claims being brought against their friends in the insurance industry continue to attract criticism. Read More
Stephen Brookes reviews two cycling injury cases making the legal headlines recently Read More
Stephen Brookes looks at two personal injury cases on either side of the fence; in the former case the claimant won but in the latter case the claimant failed. Read More
If ever there was a minefield in the application of applicable rules it is in the area of discrimination law. Stephen Brookes reviews the recent case of Griffiths v Secretary of State for Work and Pensions ( 2015) Read More
A recent case on the duty of swimming pool lifeguards confirms 1999 guidance Read More
Since April 2015 the Court has had power to strike out a claim for personal injury compensation if a claimant has been fundamentally dishonest - but what does this mean? Read More
Supreme Court decision changes the meaning of an unlawful penalty charge in contract law - Beavis v Parking Eye reviewed Read More
Working time might now include travel to and from the first and the last job for employees who are based at home. Read More
Following the decision of Salmons Solicitors to withdraw from all legal aid work upon the grounds of unsustainable remuneration levels, there is increasing pressure for criminal defence legal practices. Read More
Stephen Brookes reviews the latest attempts by the Coalition Government to make the legal claims process unworkable. Read More
Stephen Brookes reviews two recent personal injury claims where the claimants both failed. Read More
There can be few more fun pursuits than taking your off roader into difficult and challenging off road terrain, but before you do so, a cautionary word about a recent change of insurance law, writes Stephen Brookes. Read More
Stephen Brookes reviews the recent case of Bear Scotland Ltd v Fulton on the inclusion of overtime into holiday pay calculations. Read More
Stephen Brookes reviews the decision of the Supreme Court in Coventry and Lawrence (2014) Read More
Stephen Brookes reviews two recent cases dealing with the question of when an employer can be liable for injuries inflicted by a member of the workforce on another person Read More
Farah Gilani reviews a January 2014 case involving a prosecution over an unguarded piece of machinery. Read More
Stephen Brookes reviews a recent case involving an injury compensation claim brought by one friend against another arising out of the use of loaned leisure equipment. Read More
Nick Mason looks at the risk from not using a traditional high street law firm offering a quality managed service Read More